Fundamentals Supportive But Watching Support Zones Closely
September 18, 2020|2:15pm
Before we get to our weekly review of market fundamentals, I thought it would be a good idea to check in on the state of the current pullback happening in the stock market.
Now in its 11th day, the current pullback in stocks continues to look like a typical, garden-variety correction (well, to me, anyway). Through Thursday’s close, the S&P 500 has pulled back -6.25% from its September 2nd high. The NASDAQ Composite has shed -9.5%. However, the Dow is off -4.1% and the beleaguered Russell 2000 small caps are just -3% from their recent high-water marks for this cycle.
The reason for the disparity between the indices is simple. The leaders are giving back some of the spectacular gains seen in August and calendar year 2020, while the laggards didn’t have any real excess to give back. As such, they have so far avoided the ire of the sellers for the most part.
The questions of the day from a short-term perspective are, (a) where are we now and (b) does the decline have farther to go? I think the chart of the S&P 500 can help us here.
In short, all the major indices remain above their respective support zones (the second yellow line from the top). This is a good thing as it indicates that the bulls have been able to put in a stop. For now, anyway.
However, the technical analysis textbooks tell us that the more times a support zone is tested, the weaker it becomes. And with the current count of the number of tests of support currently at three (and arguable #4 if you include this morning’s early action), we should recognize that the bears are hardly back on the sidelines and that the support zone could certainly still break.
Couple this with the fact that which show that the week after the September Quadruple Witching Expirations have been historically weak (hat tip here to the fine work from Quantifiable Edges author Rob Hanna) and I think it makes sense to be prepared for another meaningful test of support.
So, in looking at the chart, if the current support fails, the next area that could possibly present line in the sand for the bulls is around 3325. And then down around 2975. From my seat, these are the important zones to watch should the bears find a way to push prices down through the current support.
The State of the Fundamental Models…
There are no changes to the Fundamental Factors board again this week. To review, Monetary conditions remain positive (and the components of the composite actually improved a bit last week, taking the hypothetical historical annual return from +7.4% to +11.4%), the economic composite is holding steady, earnings remain ok (for now), inflation remains something to watch, and valuations continue at extremely high levels. All in, my take is the board continues to favor the bulls from a big-picture, intermediate- to long-term standpoint.
View Fundamental Indicator Board Online * Source: Ned Davis Research (NDR) as of the date of publication. Historical returns are hypothetical average annual performances calculated by NDR. Past performances do not guarantee future results or profitability – NOT INDIVIDUAL INVESTMENT ADVICE.
Thought For The Day:
When in doubt, just take the next small step…
All the best, David D. Moenning Investment Strategist
At the time of publication, Mr. Moenning held long positions in the following securities mentioned: None – Note that positions may change at any time.
Fundamental Models Explained
Monetary Composite: The popular cliche, “Don’t fight the Fed” is really a testament to the profound impact that interest rates and Fed policy have on the market. It is a proven fact that monetary conditions are one of the most powerful influences on the direction of stock prices. The Monetary Composite is a combination of two proprietary monetary models developed by Ned Davis Research. The first is comprised of 14 indicators and is plotted as a composite and the second is made up of eight monetary-related indicators including money supply, and the bond and commodities markets.
Economic Composite: During the middle of bull and bear markets, understanding the overall health of the economy and how it impacts the stock market is one of the few truly logical aspects of the stock market. The economic composite is a series of three models designed to indicate the current state of the economy.
Earnings Composite: A series of four models designed to indicate the overall health of corporate earnings. The first model is based on the slope of the smoothed S&P 500 earnings per share. The second model looks at the drivers of earnings and includes indicators such as U.S. industrial production, the CRB Spot Raw Industrial Material Price Index, the Treasury yield curve, Institute for Supply Management (ISM) indices, corporate bond credit spreads, unemployment claims, and the trend in analyst earnings estimate revisions for the S&P 500. The third model is designed to indicate the likely trend in the earnings per share reported for the S&P 500 Index. This model uses a variety of macro variables to indicate whether current conditions are favorable for strong, moderate, or weak growth in S&P 500 earnings. The fourth model the median 12-month percent change in the one-year analyst forecast out of the 500 components of the index.
Inflation Model: From an historical perspective, one of the best “big picture” indicators of what the market is expected to do next is inflation. The Inflation model is designed to identify cyclical changes in the rate of inflation. The model consists of 22 individual indicators primarily measuring various rates of change of such indicators as commodity prices, the Consumer Price Index (CPI), producer prices, and industrial production.
Valuation Composite: If you want to get analysts really riled up, you need only to begin a discussion of market valuation. While the question of whether stocks are overvalued or undervalued appears to be a simple one, the subject is actually extremely complex. The Valuation composite consists of five valuation indicators/models developed by Ned Davis Research. The first valuation indicator reviews the S&P 500 Price-to-Earnings GAAP Ratio relative to normal, expensive, and bargain valuation zones. The second model measures the S&P 500’s Median P/E ratio, representing the median P/E of the 500 stocks in the index. The third model measures the Median P/E ratio of a multi-cap stock index. The fourth indicator is the P/E ratio of the Value Line Index. The fifth model is a composite of 7 indicators designed to reflect stock market valuations based on how various valuation indicators compare to their latest 10-year historical ranges.
NOT INVESTMENT ADVICE. The opinions and forecasts expressed herein are those of Mr. David Moenning and Redwood Wealth and may not actually come to pass. The opinions and viewpoints regarding the future of the markets should not be construed as investment recommendations. The analysis and information in this report is for informational purposes only. No part of the material presented in this report is intended as an investment recommendation or investment advice. Neither the information nor any opinion expressed constitutes a solicitation to purchase or sell securities or any investment program.
Any investment decisions must in all cases be made by the reader or by his or her investment adviser. Do NOT ever purchase any security without doing sufficient research. There is no guarantee that the investment objectives outlined will actually come to pass. All opinions expressed herein are subject to change without notice. Neither the editor, employees, nor any of their affiliates shall have any liability for any loss sustained by anyone who has relied on the information provided.
Mr. Moenning and Redwood Wealth may at times have positions in the securities referred to and may make purchases or sales of these securities while publications are in circulation. Positions may change at any time.
The analysis provided is based on both technical and fundamental research and is provided “as is” without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. Although the information contained is derived from sources which are believed to be reliable, they cannot be guaranteed.
Investments in equities carry an inherent element of risk including the potential for significant loss of principal. Past performance is not an indication of future results.